Electricity Bench

How we grade

Article

By the Electricity Bench editorial team · Drafted with AI, reviewed and approved by a human editor

How a grade rolls up on Electricity Bench: evaluating the complete coding agent on real subscriptions across capability, task duration, and plan quota.

A grade on Electricity Bench is not a single aggregate percentage or a synthetic puzzle score. It is a multi-dimensional scorecard evaluating real-world capability, task execution duration, and subscription quota cost.

Private suites, sealed tasks

Each evaluation suite is a collection of challenging tasks authored from real production codebases and kept strictly private. Keeping the tasks private is essential: a benchmark that AI labs can inspect is a benchmark their training pipelines will optimize for. When tasks leak into training data, the benchmark stops measuring genuine coding capability and starts measuring memorization. We publish the graded outcomes, capability tiers, completion times, and usage metrics, while the underlying tasks remain sealed.

The complete agent as the subject

We evaluate the complete agent apparatus rather than a raw foundation model behind an isolated API. An agent operates through its native harness (Claude Code, Codex CLI, Grok CLI, Antigravity CLI, Kimi Code), utilizing its own tool-calling loops, terminal access, and editing workflows. The agent runs on the standard subscription plan you would actually buy, with its default settings and declared reasoning effort.

Multi-dimensional evaluation

A model that solves a task quickly while consuming modest quota is not equivalent to one that requires an hour and exhausts your entire daily allowance. Every scorecard measures three core dimensions together:

Comparable only within a suite version

Grades are strictly comparable only within the same suite version. Whenever a suite evolves - adding new issues or refining test cases - we bump its version and start a fresh comparison baseline. We never retroactively scale or adjust historical numbers to fit newer evaluations.

Explore our active suites and test design on the Methodology page.