Electricity Bench

GPT-6 Sol

codex-cli harness · ChatGPT Plus ($20/mo)

Coding agent review, updated weekly (latest W39 2026).

GPT-6 Sol scores D+ overall on Electricity Bench and clears tier 1 of 5 on real-world issues. Its best suite is spec planning at C. One pass of our task set uses 5% of ChatGPT Plus's weekly limit. In our own use it has no clear role right now.Measured

D+OVERALL

Clears tier 1 of 5 (partial at tiers 2, 4 and 5) on Real-world issues

Capability mean across 3 graded suite families.

capability
38%
plan cost per run
4.0% of ChatGPT Plus
median task time
2m 44s
reliability
100%
12345
What the tiers mean

"Clears" marks the highest rung where every task at it and below was solved. Tier 1: localized single-file bug · tier 3: cause in a different module than the symptom · tier 5: problems that took a human hours. A cleared rung solved every task on it; a partial rung solved some. The headline stops at the last unbroken rung, so a solved tier above a half-solved one counts only as partial.

Clears level 2 of 5 (partial at levels 3, 4 and 5) on Vibe coding v1 - the vaguest report level at which it still fixed every bug, having also cleared every richer level below
12345
What the levels mean

Level 1: a full brief naming the surface and the acceptance · level 3: the report as filed · level 5: a vague vibe report in a non-technical user's words. Context falls as the level rises, so vaguer is harder. A cleared level fixed every bug at it and below; a partial level fixed some. The headline stops at the last unbroken level, so a fix above a half-cleared level counts only as partial.

9 of this suite's tasks were credited rather than run: on a suite that asks the same problem at several levels of detail, solving it from the vaguest description credits the more detailed ones instead of asking again.

Per-suite results

D-
Real-world issues v3
38%
plan cost per run
4.0% of ChatGPT Plus
median task time
2m 44s
reliability
100%
tier 1tier 2tier 3tier 4tier 5

9 of 15 tasks solved - grouped by tier, easiest first; hover a square for its time and turns.

Run on codex-cli codex-cli 0.155.1, model gpt-6-sol (-c model_reasoning_effort=medium), week 2026-W39.

One run of this suite consumes 37.0% of ChatGPT Plus's 5h window and 4.0% of the weekly limit.

ChatGPT Plus's weekly limit holds about 6 fully spent 5h windows, out of the 33.6 a calendar week contains. Published at 6.0 while the native sample is two session windows deep; the codex meter only began reporting both windows on 2026-08-31.

How the plan cost was measured

Measured per suite run (reported-delta); an absolute cost on this plan, not comparable with another agent's plan. Measured on a shared personal subscription during a quiet window, not a dedicated bench login.

How the limits work on Codex CLI: /limits/codex-cli/

C
Spec planning v1
64%
plan cost per run
1.0% of ChatGPT Plus
median task time
2m 23s
reliability
100%

0 of 4 tasks solved - hover a square for its time and turns.

Run on codex-cli codex-cli 0.155.1, model gpt-6-sol (-c model_reasoning_effort=medium), week 2026-W39.

One run of this suite consumes 8.0% of ChatGPT Plus's 5h window and 1.0% of the weekly limit.

ChatGPT Plus's weekly limit holds about 6 fully spent 5h windows, out of the 33.6 a calendar week contains. Published at 6.0 while the native sample is two session windows deep; the codex meter only began reporting both windows on 2026-08-31.

How the plan cost was measured

Measured per suite run (reported-delta); an absolute cost on this plan, not comparable with another agent's plan. Measured on a shared personal subscription during a quiet window, not a dedicated bench login.

How the limits work on Codex CLI: /limits/codex-cli/

D+
Vibe coding v1
51%
plan cost per solve
0.4% of ChatGPT Plus
median task time
3m 4s
reliability
100%
level 5level 4level 3level 2level 1issue aissue bissue cissue dissue e

19 of 25 tasks solved (9 credited without running) - each row is one bug, vaguest report first and context growing to the right; hover a square for its time and turns.

Run on codex-cli codex-cli 0.155.1, model gpt-6-sol (-c model_reasoning_effort=medium), week 2026-W39.

One good solve on this suite consumes, on average, 2.4% of ChatGPT Plus's 5h window and 0.4% of the weekly limit.

ChatGPT Plus's weekly limit holds about 6 fully spent 5h windows, out of the 33.6 a calendar week contains. Published at 6.0 while the native sample is two session windows deep; the codex meter only began reporting both windows on 2026-08-31.

How the plan cost was measured

Counted over each issue's first solve (5 solves); the walk's failed harder cells and confirmation runs are the benchmark's own search cost and are excluded (full walk: 8.0% over 16 cells). Measured per cell run (reported-delta); an absolute cost on this plan, not comparable with another agent's plan. Measured on a shared personal subscription during a quiet window, not a dedicated bench login.

How the limits work on Codex CLI: /limits/codex-cli/

Task outputs from these runs are withheld: publishing them would reveal the private suite. Per-task scores, times and turns are in the chips above.

Trajectory

One point per grading week - a re-run within a week shows only its latest execution. Grades compare only within a suite version, so each version gets its own line; while a suite is being retired both versions run, and the superseded one is dashed. The filled point is the run the scorecard shows today. Click a point or week for plan usage. All agents over time →

Suite
Real-world issues · 8 weeks graded · latest 2026-W39
30%40%50%60%70%2026-W322026-W342026-W362026-W382026-W39GPT-6 Sol · 2026-W32 · Aug 4, 2026 · 47% · DGPT-6 Sol · 2026-W33 · Aug 10, 2026 · 60% · C-GPT-6 Sol · 2026-W34 · Aug 17, 2026 · 60% · C-GPT-6 Sol · 2026-W35 · Aug 24, 2026 · 43% · DGPT-6 Sol · 2026-W36 · Aug 31, 2026 · 60% · C-GPT-6 Sol · 2026-W37 · Sep 7, 2026 · 57% · C-GPT-6 Sol · 2026-W38 · Sep 14, 2026 · 60% · C-GPT-6 Sol · 2026-W39 · Sep 21, 2026 · 60% · C-

Weekly heads

Newest week first. Click a row for usage.

WeekGradeCapabilityClearsTask timeUsage /1w
2026-W39 · v3C-60%tier 4 · p53m 13s10.0% of ChatGPT Plus
2026-W38 · v3C-60%tier 4 · p53m 11s10.0% of ChatGPT Plus
2026-W37 · v3C-57%tier 2 · p52m 27s10.0% of ChatGPT Plus
2026-W36 · v3C-60%tier 4 · p52m 50s12.6% of ChatGPT Plus
2026-W35 · v3D43%tier 2 · p52m 53s12.1% of ChatGPT Plus
2026-W34 · v3C-60%tier 4 · p52m 28s11.0% of ChatGPT Plus
2026-W33 · v3C-60%tier 4 · p52m 57s9.0% of ChatGPT Plus
2026-W32 · v3D47%tier 4 · p53m 31s11.4% of ChatGPT Plus

Embed this grade

Put GPT-6 Sol's current grade in a README or a docs page.

GPT-6 Sol on Electricity Bench: D+

Markdown
[![GPT-6 Sol on Electricity Bench: D+](https://electricitybench.com/badge/codex-cli-gpt-6-sol.svg)](https://electricitybench.com/models/codex-cli-gpt-6-sol/)
HTML
<a href="https://electricitybench.com/models/codex-cli-gpt-6-sol/"><img src="https://electricitybench.com/badge/codex-cli-gpt-6-sol.svg" alt="GPT-6 Sol on Electricity Bench: D+"></a>

Badges update every Monday with the weekly run. GitHub renders them from this URL.

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Sol worth it on ChatGPT Plus?

On our private real-world suite (real-world@v3), GPT-6 Sol earned grade D- with 38% capability, clearing every problem up to tier 1 of 5 - a localized single-file bug and landing some tier 5 problems. It runs on ChatGPT Plus at $20/month (public price as of 2026-07-20). One full suite run consumed 4.0% of the plan's week window. Measured 2026-09-23.

Is GPT-6 Sol good for coding?

GPT-6 Sol clears tier 1 of our five-tier real-world ladder - every task at that tier and below - where tier 1 is a localized single-file bug and tier 5 is a problem that took a human engineer hours. It solves some but not all tasks up at tier 5. Its capability score on real-world@v3 is 38% (grade D-). Last benchmarked 2026-09-23.

How much of ChatGPT Plus does one GPT-6 Sol task use?

One full suite run consumed 4.0% of ChatGPT Plus's weekly limit, read off the provider's own meter before and after the run. A benchmark task is a whole multi-turn agent session, not a message, and the share belongs to this plan alone: it is not comparable with another agent's plan. Measured 2026-09-23.

Compare