← Compare subscriptions
Google AI Pro vs Kimi Allegretto
Google AI Pro is for fast, capable work at $20, plus Gemini everywhere else; Kimi Allegretto is for people who specifically want an open-weight model. Kimi Allegretto costs $39/mo, 1.9x Google AI Pro's $20/mo.
Our verdict
The Google ladder. It splits at $20. Below that, AI Plus is Gemini in the chat apps and no coding agent worth the name. From AI Pro up, every rung runs the same Antigravity CLI with the same models; Ultra buys volume, not capability.
The Moonshot AI ladder. Every Kimi tier runs the same open-weight K3 on the same credit mechanics, and the rungs are credit multiples of the $19 tier (roughly 2x, 5x and 10x its allowance). Pick a rung by how much you will use; the model is identical everywhere.
Google AI Pro is for fast, capable work at $20, plus Gemini everywhere else; Kimi Allegretto is for people who specifically want an open-weight model.
Kimi Allegretto costs $39/mo, 1.9x Google AI Pro's $20/mo.
We have not measured Kimi Allegretto on its own plan; its card below points at the closest graded evidence.
The most improved plan we track, and fast-and-cheap now belongs to it outright. Gemini 3.7 Flash is quick and genuinely good on the work we give it, prompted apps included. The gripe is the Antigravity harness itself: rough-looking, and looser with your instructions than the better harnesses.
Pros
- 3.7 Flash owns the fast-and-cheap lane: quick and actually good
- A real coding agent at $20
- Gemini in Docs, Gmail and the chat app thrown in
Cons
- About eight real-world runs empty the weekly window
- The Antigravity harness looks rough and is loose with instructions
Best for Fast, capable work at $20, plus Gemini everywhere else.
How far it goes: about 9 to 10 times a week
Our whole Real-world issues suite runs about 9 to 10 times a week on this plan, depending on which model you run.
That works out at about 39c to 52c of the subscription per run, at the list price.
Measured on this plan, at 8.5% to 11.3%/1w of its allowance per run. A share belongs to the plan it was measured on, so we never subtract one plan's from another's.
K3 was the closest open-weight challenger, and in our use it has gone backwards: less done with the same prompts, credits draining as fast as ever. If open weights are the requirement, this is still the tier to buy; we just would not put $39 here for the results alone.
Pros
- The sensible Kimi tier if open weights are the requirement
- Long context is a real strength
Cons
- Noticeably weaker than it was a few months ago
- Credits drain faster than the price suggests
Best for People who specifically want an open-weight model.
How far it goes: we have not measured this plan
The K3 subject sat out the latest weekly grading run, so there is no current scorecard; see the leaderboard for graded alternatives.
The leaderboard lists every plan we do grade.
Verdicts and prices are the quiz's versioned editorial catalog, last reviewed 2026-08-20; usage figures come from our own published runs and stay a share of each plan's own allowance. Any other pair composes on the subscription comparison, and the quiz turns your answers into a recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Which should I pick, Google AI Pro or Kimi Allegretto?
Google AI Pro is for fast, capable work at $20, plus Gemini everywhere else; Kimi Allegretto is for people who specifically want an open-weight model.
How much do Google AI Pro and Kimi Allegretto cost?
Google AI Pro costs $20/month (public price as of 2026-08-12); Kimi Allegretto costs $39/month (public price as of 2026-08-12).
How far does a suite run go on Google AI Pro versus Kimi Allegretto?
Our whole Real-world issues suite fits about 9 to 10 times a week on Google AI Pro. We have not measured Kimi Allegretto on its own plan. Each figure is a share of that plan's own allowance, so the two are never subtracted.