← Compare subscriptions
Claude Pro vs Kimi Allegretto
Claude Pro is for writing and daily focused blocks, when coding is not the main job; Kimi Allegretto is for people who specifically want an open-weight model. Kimi Allegretto costs $39/mo, 1.9x Claude Pro's $20/mo.
Our verdict
The Anthropic ladder. Every Claude plan is Claude Code on the same 5-hour rolling window, and a bigger rung buys a bigger allowance. The exception is Fable, which ships only on the Max tiers, so $20 buys Opus 5 and Sonnet 5 rather than the flagship. Our paired runs put the real 5x-to-20x gap nearer 5.7x than the advertised 4x.
The Moonshot AI ladder. Every Kimi tier runs the same open-weight K3 on the same credit mechanics, and the rungs are credit multiples of the $19 tier (roughly 2x, 5x and 10x its allowance). Pick a rung by how much you will use; the model is identical everywhere.
Claude Pro is for writing and daily focused blocks, when coding is not the main job; Kimi Allegretto is for people who specifically want an open-weight model.
Kimi Allegretto costs $39/mo, 1.9x Claude Pro's $20/mo.
We have not measured Claude Pro on its own plan; its card below points at the closest graded evidence.
We have not measured Kimi Allegretto on its own plan; its card below points at the closest graded evidence.
The plan people buy for Fable does not include Fable - it ships on the Max tiers only, so $20 buys Opus 5 and Sonnet 5. That changes the answer: on our hardest work Opus sits behind Codex's Sol, which costs the same $20 and burns a fraction of the window. What Claude Pro still wins on is rhythm - the 5-hour rolling window is back by lunch, not next Tuesday - and everything that is not coding.
Pros
- The 5-hour window refills the same day, not weekly
- The best writing and thinking assistant at $20
- Same window mechanics as the Max tiers
Cons
- No Fable: the model the ladder is famous for starts at $100
- Opus 5 trails Sol on our hardest real-world tasks
- You will meet the allowance, and the promotion propping up its value will end
Best for Writing and daily focused blocks, when coding is not the main job.
How far it goes: we have not measured this plan
The Max 20x scorecards are the closest evidence, minus Fable: that model is Max-only, so the best agent this plan can run is Opus 5.
The leaderboard lists every plan we do grade.
K3 was the closest open-weight challenger, and in our use it has gone backwards: less done with the same prompts, credits draining as fast as ever. If open weights are the requirement, this is still the tier to buy; we just would not put $39 here for the results alone.
Pros
- The sensible Kimi tier if open weights are the requirement
- Long context is a real strength
Cons
- Noticeably weaker than it was a few months ago
- Credits drain faster than the price suggests
Best for People who specifically want an open-weight model.
How far it goes: we have not measured this plan
The K3 subject sat out the latest weekly grading run, so there is no current scorecard; see the leaderboard for graded alternatives.
The leaderboard lists every plan we do grade.
Verdicts and prices are the quiz's versioned editorial catalog, last reviewed 2026-08-20; usage figures come from our own published runs and stay a share of each plan's own allowance. Any other pair composes on the subscription comparison, and the quiz turns your answers into a recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Which should I pick, Claude Pro or Kimi Allegretto?
Claude Pro is for writing and daily focused blocks, when coding is not the main job; Kimi Allegretto is for people who specifically want an open-weight model.
How much do Claude Pro and Kimi Allegretto cost?
Claude Pro costs $20/month (public price as of 2026-08-12); Kimi Allegretto costs $39/month (public price as of 2026-08-12).