composer-2.5 vs grok-4.6
Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.
| Dimension | composer-2.5 | grok-4.6 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 60% | 58% | +2% (composer-2.5 leads) |
| Median task time | 3m 52s | 6m 45s | 2m 53s faster (composer-2.5 leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.025 / task | $0.072 / task | $0.047 / task lower (composer-2.5 leads) |
composer-2.5: 1.9% of Cursor Pro (1.9% / 1m) per run. grok-4.6: 15.6% of SuperGrok (15.6% / 1w) per run. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
| Dimension | composer-2.5 | grok-4.6 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 52% | 85% | +33% (grok-4.6 leads) |
| Median task time | 4m 56s | 7m 33s | 2m 37s faster (composer-2.5 leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.025 / task | $0.094 / task | $0.068 / task lower (composer-2.5 leads) |
composer-2.5: 0.1% of Cursor Pro (0.1% / 1m) per good solve. grok-4.6: 1.4% of SuperGrok (1.4% / 1w) per good solve. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for coding, composer-2.5 or grok-4.6?
composer-2.5 clears higher: tier 4 of 5 versus tier 1 for grok-4.6 on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-08-10.
How much do composer-2.5 and grok-4.6 cost?
composer-2.5 runs on Cursor Pro at $20/month (public price as of 2026-07-20). grok-4.6 runs on SuperGrok at $30/month (public price as of 2026-07-20).