cursor-cli + composer-2.5 (Cursor Pro) vs grok-cli + grok-4.5
Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Deltas are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.
cursor-clicursor-cli + composer-2.5 (Cursor Pro)Solves up to tier 5 at 1.7% of Cursor Pro per run · 60.2 runs/monthoverall pendinggrok-cligrok-cli + grok-4.5Solves up to tier 5 at 8.0% of SuperGrok per run · 12.5 runs/weekoverall pending
real-world@v3CvsC
| Dimension | cursor-cli + composer-2.5 (Cursor Pro) | grok-cli + grok-4.5 | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 57% | 60% | 3% · grok-cli + grok-4.5 |
| Median latency | 117231 ms | 246650 ms | 129419 ms · cursor-cli + composer-2.5 (Cursor Pro) |
| Reliability | 100% | 100% | even |
| Error rate | 0% | 0% | even |
cursor-cli + composer-2.5 (Cursor Pro): 1.7% of Cursor Pro per run, about 60.2 runs per month. grok-cli + grok-4.5: 8.0% of SuperGrok per run, about 12.5 runs per week. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.