Electricity Bench

gpt-5.6-terra vs composer-2.5

Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.

gpt-5.6-terraClears tier 3 (partial tier 5) at 2.1% of ChatGPT Plus per runDOVERALLcomposer-2.5Clears tier 4 (partial tier 5) at 1.9% of Cursor Pro per runCOVERALL
real-world@v3DvsC
Dimensiongpt-5.6-terracomposer-2.5Advantage
Capability53%60%+7% (composer-2.5 leads)
Median task time1m 57s3m 52s1m 55s faster (gpt-5.6-terra leads)
Approx. task cost$0.006 / task$0.025 / task$0.018 / task lower (gpt-5.6-terra leads)

gpt-5.6-terra: 2.1% of ChatGPT Plus (2.1% / 1w) per run. composer-2.5: 1.9% of Cursor Pro (1.9% / 1m) per run. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

vibe-coding@v1DvsD
Dimensiongpt-5.6-terracomposer-2.5Advantage
Capability52%52%+1% (gpt-5.6-terra leads)
Median task time3m 12s4m 56s1m 44s faster (gpt-5.6-terra leads)
Approx. task cost$0.008 / task$0.025 / task$0.018 / task lower (gpt-5.6-terra leads)

gpt-5.6-terra: 0.2% of ChatGPT Plus (0.2% / 1w) per good solve. composer-2.5: 0.1% of Cursor Pro (0.1% / 1m) per good solve. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, gpt-5.6-terra or composer-2.5?

composer-2.5 clears higher: tier 4 of 5 versus tier 3 for gpt-5.6-terra on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-08-10.

How much do gpt-5.6-terra and composer-2.5 cost?

gpt-5.6-terra runs on ChatGPT Plus at $20/month (public price as of 2026-07-20). composer-2.5 runs on Cursor Pro at $20/month (public price as of 2026-07-20).