Electricity Bench

claude-opus-5 vs composer-2.5

Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.

claude-opus-5Clears tier 2 (partial tier 5) at 11.0% of Claude Max 20x per runCOVERALLcomposer-2.5Clears tier 4 (partial tier 5) at 1.9% of Cursor Pro per runCOVERALL
real-world@v3CvsC
Dimensionclaude-opus-5composer-2.5Advantage
Capability57%60%+3% (composer-2.5 leads)
Median task time3m 57s3m 52s5s faster (composer-2.5 leads)
Approx. task cost$0.010 / task$0.025 / task$0.015 / task lower (claude-opus-5 leads)

claude-opus-5: 11.0% of Claude Max 20x (11.0% / 5h) per run. composer-2.5: 1.9% of Cursor Pro (1.9% / 1m) per run. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

vibe-coding@v1DvsD
Dimensionclaude-opus-5composer-2.5Advantage
Capability54%52%+2% (claude-opus-5 leads)
Median task time6m 57s4m 56s2m 1s faster (composer-2.5 leads)
Approx. task cost$0.016 / task$0.025 / task$0.009 / task lower (claude-opus-5 leads)

claude-opus-5: 1.2% of Claude Max 20x (1.2% / 5h) per good solve. composer-2.5: 0.1% of Cursor Pro (0.1% / 1m) per good solve. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, claude-opus-5 or composer-2.5?

composer-2.5 clears higher: tier 4 of 5 versus tier 2 for claude-opus-5 on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-08-10.

How much do claude-opus-5 and composer-2.5 cost?

claude-opus-5 runs on Claude Max 20x at $200/month (public price as of 2026-08-05). composer-2.5 runs on Cursor Pro at $20/month (public price as of 2026-07-20).