Electricity Bench

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 leads overall, C+ to F. The two cost about the same per task. By suite, Claude Opus 5.5 takes real-world issues (C- to D+) and spec planning (C+ to F). The data gives no reason to pick Claude Haiku 4.5 over Claude Opus 5.5 this week.Measured

Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.

Verdict: Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Haiku 4.5

Claude Opus 5.5 leads overall, C+ to F. By suite: Claude Opus 5.5 takes real-world issues, C- to D+ (60% vs 50% capability); Claude Opus 5.5 takes spec planning, C+ to F (69% vs 19% capability); Claude Opus 5.5 takes vibe coding, B to F (85% vs 23% capability). Claude Haiku 4.5 used 1% of Claude Max 5x's weekly limit per pass, $0.012 per task at the listed price. Claude Opus 5.5 used 1% of Claude Max 5x's weekly limit per pass, $0.012 per task at the listed price. Per task the two cost about the same ($0.012 vs $0.012). Claude Opus 5.5 is faster on real-world issues: a median task takes 2m 18s against 3m 39s. Both finished every task on it. The data gives no reason to pick Claude Haiku 4.5 over Claude Opus 5.5 this week.

Changed since W32: Claude Haiku 4.5: real-world issues F to D+.

Claude Haiku 4.5Clears tier 2 (partial tier 5) at 13.0% of Claude Max 5x per runFOVERALLClaude Opus 5.5Clears tier 4 (partial tier 5) at 16.0% of Claude Max 5x per runC+OVERALL
real-world@v3D+vsC-
DimensionClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 5.5Advantage
Capability50%60%+10% (Claude Opus 5.5 leads)
Median task time3m 39s2m 18s1m 21s faster (Claude Opus 5.5 leads)
Approx. task cost$0.015 / task$0.015 / taskEven

Claude Haiku 4.5: 13.0% of Claude Max 5x (13.0% / 5h, 1.0% / 1w) per run. Its weekly limit holds about 14.6 of the week's 33.6 5h windows. Claude Opus 5.5: 16.0% of Claude Max 5x (16.0% / 5h, 1.0% / 1w) per run. Its weekly limit holds about 14.6 of the week's 33.6 5h windows. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

Work per window: Claude Haiku 4.5 1124 vs Claude Opus 5.5 913 suite runs per month (Claude Haiku 4.5 leads); per plan-dollar: 11.24 vs 9.13 (Claude Haiku 4.5 leads). Work figures compare outputs, so unlike quota shares they are comparable across plans.

spec-planning@v1FvsC+
DimensionClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 5.5Advantage
Capability19%69%+50% (Claude Opus 5.5 leads)
Median task time1m 56s3m 45s1m 49s faster (Claude Haiku 4.5 leads)
Approx. task cost$0.002 / task$0.010 / task$0.009 / task lower (Claude Haiku 4.5 leads)

Claude Haiku 4.5: 1.0% of Claude Max 5x (1.0% / 5h) per run. Its weekly limit holds about 14.6 of the week's 33.6 5h windows. Claude Opus 5.5: 6.0% of Claude Max 5x (6.0% / 5h) per run. Its weekly limit holds about 14.6 of the week's 33.6 5h windows. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

Work per window: Claude Haiku 4.5 14610 vs Claude Opus 5.5 2435 suite runs per month (Claude Haiku 4.5 leads); per plan-dollar: 146.10 vs 24.35 (Claude Haiku 4.5 leads). Work figures compare outputs, so unlike quota shares they are comparable across plans.

vibe-coding@v1FvsB
DimensionClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Opus 5.5Advantage
Capability23%85%+62% (Claude Opus 5.5 leads)
Median task time3m 36s2m 27s1m 10s faster (Claude Opus 5.5 leads)
Approx. task cost$0.057 / task$0.046 / task$0.011 / task lower (Claude Opus 5.5 leads)

Claude Haiku 4.5: 2.0% of Claude Max 5x (2.0% / 5h, 0.3% / 1w) per good solve. Its weekly limit holds about 14.6 of the week's 33.6 5h windows. Claude Opus 5.5: 0.8% of Claude Max 5x (0.8% / 5h, 0.2% / 1w) per good solve. Its weekly limit holds about 14.6 of the week's 33.6 5h windows. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

Work per window: Claude Haiku 4.5 7305 vs Claude Opus 5.5 18263 good solves per month (Claude Opus 5.5 leads); per plan-dollar: 73.05 vs 182.63 (Claude Opus 5.5 leads). Work figures compare outputs, so unlike quota shares they are comparable across plans.

Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Opus 5.5 clears higher: tier 4 of 5 versus tier 2 for Claude Haiku 4.5 on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-09-21.

Which is cheaper per task, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Haiku 4.5 used 1% of Claude Max 5x's weekly limit per pass, $0.012 per task at the listed price. Claude Opus 5.5 used 1% of Claude Max 5x's weekly limit per pass, $0.012 per task at the listed price. Per task the two cost about the same ($0.012 vs $0.012).

Which gives more coding work per dollar, Claude Haiku 4.5 or Claude Opus 5.5?

Claude Haiku 4.5 delivers more benchmark work per subscription dollar: 11.24 suite runs per plan-dollar versus 9.13 for Claude Opus 5.5 (at $100/month priced 2026-07-20, and $100/month priced 2026-07-27). Work figures compare outputs, so unlike raw quota shares they are comparable across plans.

What do Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 5.5 cost a month?

Claude Haiku 4.5 runs on Claude Max 5x at $100/month (public price as of 2026-07-20). Claude Opus 5.5 runs on Claude Max 5x at $100/month (public price as of 2026-07-27).