Electricity Bench

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 was superseded by Claude Fable 5.1. The grades below are the last ones measured, so read them as history rather than as this week's board. See the current roster.

Claude Fable 5 leads overall, C to C-. Gemini 3.8 Flash is about 3.0x cheaper per task. By suite, real-world issues is even at C- and Claude Fable 5 takes spec planning (C to D+). Take Gemini 3.8 Flash anyway when you want the side that is cheaper per task.Measured

Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.

Verdict: Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Claude Fable 5 leads overall, C to C-. By suite: real-world issues is even at C- (60% vs 60% capability); Claude Fable 5 takes spec planning, C to D+ (63% vs 50% capability); Claude Fable 5 takes vibe coding, C+ to C- (74% vs 56% capability). Gemini 3.8 Flash used 23.7% of Google AI Pro's weekly limit per pass, $0.057 per task at the listed price. Claude Fable 5 used 7% of Claude Max 20x's weekly limit per pass, $0.169 per task at the listed price; at the ~$100 tier the board defaults to that is an estimated ~14% of Claude Max 5x's weekly limit (est, about $0.169 per task). Per task, Gemini 3.8 Flash is about 3.0x cheaper ($0.057 vs $0.169). Claude Fable 5 is faster on real-world issues: a median task takes 2m 37s against 5m 21s. Both finished every task on it. Reasons to pick Gemini 3.8 Flash anyway: it is cheaper per task ($0.057 vs $0.169).

Changed since the previous graded week: Gemini 3.8 Flash: real-world issues F to C-, real-world issues usage 18.0% to 21.9% of the weekly limit, spec planning usage 2.0% to 1.8% of the weekly limit, vibe coding D+ to C-, vibe coding usage 1.2% to 1.1% of the weekly limit; Claude Fable 5: real-world issues C+ to C-, vibe coding C to C+.

Gemini 3.8 FlashClears tier 4 (partial tier 5) at 21.9% of Google AI Pro per runC-OVERALLClaude Fable 5Clears tier 4 (partial tier 5) at 33.0% of Claude Max 20x per runCOVERALL
real-world@v3C-vsC-
DimensionGemini 3.8 FlashClaude Fable 5Advantage
Capability60%60%Even
Median task time5m 21s2m 37s2m 44s faster (Claude Fable 5 leads)
Approx. task cost$0.067 / task$0.153 / task$0.086 / task lower (Gemini 3.8 Flash leads)

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 21.9% of Google AI Pro (131.3% / 5h, 21.9% / 1w) per run. Its weekly limit holds 6 of the week's 33.6 5h windows. Claude Fable 5: 33.0% of Claude Max 20x (33.0% / 5h, 5.0% / 1w) per run. Its weekly limit holds about 7 of the week's 33.6 5h windows. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

spec-planning@v1D+vsC
DimensionGemini 3.8 FlashClaude Fable 5Advantage
Capability50%63%+13% (Claude Fable 5 leads)
Median task time3m 0s5m 32s2m 32s faster (Gemini 3.8 Flash leads)
Approx. task cost$0.021 / task$0.230 / task$0.209 / task lower (Gemini 3.8 Flash leads)

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1.8% of Google AI Pro (11.0% / 5h, 1.8% / 1w) per run. Its weekly limit holds 6 of the week's 33.6 5h windows. Claude Fable 5: 10.0% of Claude Max 20x (10.0% / 5h, 2.0% / 1w) per run. Its weekly limit holds about 7 of the week's 33.6 5h windows. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

vibe-coding@v1C-vsC+
DimensionGemini 3.8 FlashClaude Fable 5Advantage
Capability56%74%+18% (Claude Fable 5 leads)
Median task time7m 51s5m 28s2m 22s faster (Claude Fable 5 leads)
Approx. task cost$0.048 / task$0.184 / task$0.136 / task lower (Gemini 3.8 Flash leads)

Gemini 3.8 Flash: 1.1% of Google AI Pro (6.3% / 5h, 1.1% / 1w) per good solve. Its weekly limit holds 6 of the week's 33.6 5h windows. Claude Fable 5: 2.8% of Claude Max 20x (2.8% / 5h, 0.4% / 1w) per good solve. Its weekly limit holds about 7 of the week's 33.6 5h windows. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Claude Fable 5?

They are even on our ladder: both clear tier 4 of 5 at 60% capability on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-09-27.

Which is cheaper per task, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Claude Fable 5?

Gemini 3.8 Flash used 23.7% of Google AI Pro's weekly limit per pass, $0.057 per task at the listed price. Claude Fable 5 used 7% of Claude Max 20x's weekly limit per pass, $0.169 per task at the listed price; at the ~$100 tier the board defaults to that is an estimated ~14% of Claude Max 5x's weekly limit (est, about $0.169 per task). Per task, Gemini 3.8 Flash is about 3.0x cheaper ($0.057 vs $0.169).