gemini-3.7-flash vs grok-4.5
Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.
| Dimension | gemini-3.7-flash | grok-4.5 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 53% | 60% | +7% (grok-4.5 leads) |
| Median task time | 2m 50s | 3m 9s | 19s faster (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.035 / task | $0.032 / task | $0.003 / task lower (grok-4.5 leads) |
gemini-3.7-flash: 11.3% of Google AI Pro (67.8% / 5h, 11.3% / 1w) per run. grok-4.5: 6.9% of SuperGrok (6.9% / 1w) per run. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
Only gemini-3.7-flash has run this suite, so there is no head-to-head yet.
| Dimension | gemini-3.7-flash | grok-4.5 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 79% | 59% | +21% (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Median task time | 4m 7s | 3m 40s | 27s faster (grok-4.5 leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.029 / task | $0.031 / task | $0.002 / task lower (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
gemini-3.7-flash: 0.6% of Google AI Pro (3.7% / 5h, 0.6% / 1w) per good solve. grok-4.5: 0.4% of SuperGrok (0.4% / 1w) per good solve. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for coding, gemini-3.7-flash or grok-4.5?
grok-4.5 clears higher: tier 4 of 5 versus tier 3 for gemini-3.7-flash on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-08-16.