gemini-3.7-flash vs grok-4.6
Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.
| Dimension | gemini-3.7-flash | grok-4.6 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 73% | 58% | +15% (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Median task time | 2m 25s | 6m 45s | 4m 20s faster (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.028 / task | $0.072 / task | $0.044 / task lower (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
gemini-3.7-flash: 9.0% of Google AI Pro (54.0% / 5h, 9.0% / 1w) per run. grok-4.6: 15.6% of SuperGrok (15.6% / 1w) per run. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
| Dimension | gemini-3.7-flash | grok-4.6 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 72% | 85% | +13% (grok-4.6 leads) |
| Median task time | 3m 37s | 7m 33s | 3m 56s faster (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.031 / task | $0.094 / task | $0.063 / task lower (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
gemini-3.7-flash: 0.7% of Google AI Pro (4.0% / 5h, 0.7% / 1w) per good solve. grok-4.6: 1.4% of SuperGrok (1.4% / 1w) per good solve. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for coding, gemini-3.7-flash or grok-4.6?
gemini-3.7-flash clears higher: tier 4 of 5 versus tier 1 for grok-4.6 on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-08-13.