gemini-3.7-flash vs grok-4.5
Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.
| Dimension | gemini-3.7-flash | grok-4.5 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 73% | 60% | +13% (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Median task time | 2m 25s | 3m 9s | 44s faster (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.028 / task | $0.032 / task | $0.004 / task lower (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
gemini-3.7-flash: 9.0% of Google AI Pro (54.0% / 5h, 9.0% / 1w) per run. grok-4.5: 6.9% of SuperGrok (6.9% / 1w) per run. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
| Dimension | gemini-3.7-flash | grok-4.5 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 72% | 59% | +13% (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Median task time | 3m 37s | 3m 40s | 2s faster (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.031 / task | $0.031 / task | $0.000 / task lower (grok-4.5 leads) |
gemini-3.7-flash: 0.7% of Google AI Pro (4.0% / 5h, 0.7% / 1w) per good solve. grok-4.5: 0.4% of SuperGrok (0.4% / 1w) per good solve. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for coding, gemini-3.7-flash or grok-4.5?
Both clear tier 4 of 5, but gemini-3.7-flash scores higher on capability: 73% versus 60% on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-08-13.