gemini-3.7-flash vs composer-2.5
Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.
| Dimension | gemini-3.7-flash | composer-2.5 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 73% | 60% | +13% (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Median task time | 2m 25s | 3m 52s | 1m 27s faster (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.028 / task | $0.025 / task | $0.003 / task lower (composer-2.5 leads) |
gemini-3.7-flash: 9.0% of Google AI Pro (54.0% / 5h, 9.0% / 1w) per run. composer-2.5: 1.9% of Cursor Pro (1.9% / 1m) per run. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
| Dimension | gemini-3.7-flash | composer-2.5 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 72% | 52% | +20% (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Median task time | 3m 37s | 4m 56s | 1m 19s faster (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.031 / task | $0.025 / task | $0.005 / task lower (composer-2.5 leads) |
gemini-3.7-flash: 0.7% of Google AI Pro (4.0% / 5h, 0.7% / 1w) per good solve. composer-2.5: 0.1% of Cursor Pro (0.1% / 1m) per good solve. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for coding, gemini-3.7-flash or composer-2.5?
Both clear tier 4 of 5, but gemini-3.7-flash scores higher on capability: 73% versus 60% on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-08-13.