Electricity Bench

gemini-3.7-flash vs gpt-5.6-sol

Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.

gemini-3.7-flashClears tier 4 (partial tier 5) at 9.0% of Google AI Pro per runCOVERALLgpt-5.6-solClears tier 4 (partial tier 5) at 2.8% of ChatGPT Plus per runCOVERALL
real-world@v3CvsC
Dimensiongemini-3.7-flashgpt-5.6-solAdvantage
Capability73%60%+13% (gemini-3.7-flash leads)
Median task time2m 25s2m 57s32s faster (gemini-3.7-flash leads)
Approx. task cost$0.028 / task$0.009 / task$0.019 / task lower (gpt-5.6-sol leads)

gemini-3.7-flash: 9.0% of Google AI Pro (54.0% / 5h, 9.0% / 1w) per run. gpt-5.6-sol: 2.8% of ChatGPT Plus (2.8% / 1w) per run. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

vibe-coding@v1CvsD
Dimensiongemini-3.7-flashgpt-5.6-solAdvantage
Capability72%55%+17% (gemini-3.7-flash leads)
Median task time3m 37s3m 32s5s faster (gpt-5.6-sol leads)
Approx. task cost$0.031 / task$0.012 / task$0.019 / task lower (gpt-5.6-sol leads)

gemini-3.7-flash: 0.7% of Google AI Pro (4.0% / 5h, 0.7% / 1w) per good solve. gpt-5.6-sol: 0.3% of ChatGPT Plus (0.3% / 1w) per good solve. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, gemini-3.7-flash or gpt-5.6-sol?

Both clear tier 4 of 5, but gemini-3.7-flash scores higher on capability: 73% versus 60% on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-08-13.