gemini-3.7-flash vs claude-haiku-4-5
Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.
| Dimension | gemini-3.7-flash | claude-haiku-4-5 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 73% | 28% | +45% (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Median task time | 2m 25s | 3m 31s | 1m 6s faster (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.028 / task | $0.003 / task | $0.025 / task lower (claude-haiku-4-5 leads) |
gemini-3.7-flash: 9.0% of Google AI Pro (54.0% / 5h, 9.0% / 1w) per run. claude-haiku-4-5: 3.0% of Claude Max 20x (3.0% / 5h, 1.0% / 1w) per run. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
| Dimension | gemini-3.7-flash | claude-haiku-4-5 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 72% | 23% | +48% (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Median task time | 3m 37s | 3m 50s | 13s faster (gemini-3.7-flash leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.031 / task | $0.007 / task | $0.024 / task lower (claude-haiku-4-5 leads) |
gemini-3.7-flash: 0.7% of Google AI Pro (4.0% / 5h, 0.7% / 1w) per good solve. claude-haiku-4-5: 0.5% of Claude Max 20x (0.5% / 5h) per good solve. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for coding, gemini-3.7-flash or claude-haiku-4-5?
gemini-3.7-flash clears higher: tier 4 of 5 versus tier 1 for claude-haiku-4-5 on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-08-13.