gemini-3.6-flash vs kimi-k3-256k
Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.
| Dimension | gemini-3.6-flash | kimi-k3-256k | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 60% | 57% | +3% (gemini-3.6-flash leads) |
| Median task time | 2m 17s | 3m 3s | 46s faster (gemini-3.6-flash leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.039 / task | $0.018 / task | $0.021 / task lower (kimi-k3-256k leads) |
gemini-3.6-flash: 12.6% of Google AI Pro (about 72.1% / 5h, 12.6% / 1w) per run. kimi-k3-256k: 99.0% of Kimi Allegretto (99.0% / 5h, 20.0% / 1w) per run. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
Only kimi-k3-256k has run this suite, so there is no head-to-head yet.
| Dimension | gemini-3.6-flash | kimi-k3-256k | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 72% | 38% | +34% (gemini-3.6-flash leads) |
| Median task time | 1m 54s | 6m 37s | 4m 43s faster (gemini-3.6-flash leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.038 / task | $0.027 / task | $0.010 / task lower (kimi-k3-256k leads) |
gemini-3.6-flash: 0.8% of Google AI Pro (4.9% / 5h, 0.8% / 1w) per good solve. kimi-k3-256k: 10.2% of Kimi Allegretto (10.2% / 5h, 2.0% / 1w) per good solve. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for coding, gemini-3.6-flash or kimi-k3-256k?
gemini-3.6-flash clears higher: tier 4 of 5 versus tier 2 for kimi-k3-256k on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-08-10.