gemini-3.1-pro vs grok-4.6
Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.
| Dimension | gemini-3.1-pro | grok-4.6 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 47% | 58% | +12% (grok-4.6 leads) |
| Median task time | 4m 24s | 6m 45s | 2m 21s faster (gemini-3.1-pro leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.025 / task | $0.072 / task | $0.047 / task lower (gemini-3.1-pro leads) |
gemini-3.1-pro: 8.0% of Google AI Pro (48.1% / 5h, 8.0% / 1w) per run. grok-4.6: 15.6% of SuperGrok (15.6% / 1w) per run. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
| Dimension | gemini-3.1-pro | grok-4.6 | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | 25% | 85% | +59% (grok-4.6 leads) |
| Median task time | 4m 34s | 7m 33s | 2m 59s faster (gemini-3.1-pro leads) |
| Approx. task cost | $0.032 / task | $0.094 / task | $0.062 / task lower (gemini-3.1-pro leads) |
gemini-3.1-pro: 0.7% of Google AI Pro (4.2% / 5h, 0.7% / 1w) per good solve. grok-4.6: 1.4% of SuperGrok (1.4% / 1w) per good solve. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.
Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better for coding, gemini-3.1-pro or grok-4.6?
gemini-3.1-pro clears higher: tier 3 of 5 versus tier 1 for grok-4.6 on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-08-10.