Electricity Bench

gemini-3.1-pro vs claude-opus-5

Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.

gemini-3.1-proClears tier 3 (partial tier 5) at 8.0% of Google AI Pro per runDOVERALLclaude-opus-5Clears tier 2 (partial tier 5) at 11.0% of Claude Max 20x per runCOVERALL
real-world@v3DvsC
Dimensiongemini-3.1-proclaude-opus-5Advantage
Capability47%57%+10% (claude-opus-5 leads)
Median task time4m 24s3m 57s27s faster (claude-opus-5 leads)
Approx. task cost$0.025 / task$0.010 / task$0.015 / task lower (claude-opus-5 leads)

gemini-3.1-pro: 8.0% of Google AI Pro (48.1% / 5h, 8.0% / 1w) per run. claude-opus-5: 11.0% of Claude Max 20x (11.0% / 5h) per run. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

vibe-coding@v1FvsD
Dimensiongemini-3.1-proclaude-opus-5Advantage
Capability25%54%+28% (claude-opus-5 leads)
Median task time4m 34s6m 57s2m 24s faster (gemini-3.1-pro leads)
Approx. task cost$0.032 / task$0.016 / task$0.016 / task lower (claude-opus-5 leads)

gemini-3.1-pro: 0.7% of Google AI Pro (4.2% / 5h, 0.7% / 1w) per good solve. claude-opus-5: 1.2% of Claude Max 20x (1.2% / 5h) per good solve. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, gemini-3.1-pro or claude-opus-5?

gemini-3.1-pro clears higher: tier 3 of 5 versus tier 2 for claude-opus-5 on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-08-10.