Electricity Bench

gemini-3.1-pro vs gemini-3.7-flash

Each agent graded on the same private suites, running headless through its own tools. Advantages are oriented so a win is a win, whichever way the metric runs.

gemini-3.1-proClears tier 3 (partial tier 5) at 8.0% of Google AI Pro per runDOVERALLgemini-3.7-flashClears tier 4 (partial tier 5) at 9.0% of Google AI Pro per runCOVERALL
real-world@v3DvsC
Dimensiongemini-3.1-progemini-3.7-flashAdvantage
Capability47%73%+27% (gemini-3.7-flash leads)
Median task time4m 24s2m 25s1m 59s faster (gemini-3.7-flash leads)
Approx. task cost$0.025 / task$0.028 / task$0.003 / task lower (gemini-3.1-pro leads)

gemini-3.1-pro: 8.0% of Google AI Pro (48.1% / 5h, 8.0% / 1w) per run. gemini-3.7-flash: 9.0% of Google AI Pro (54.0% / 5h, 9.0% / 1w) per run. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

vibe-coding@v1FvsC
Dimensiongemini-3.1-progemini-3.7-flashAdvantage
Capability25%72%+46% (gemini-3.7-flash leads)
Median task time4m 34s3m 37s56s faster (gemini-3.7-flash leads)
Approx. task cost$0.032 / task$0.031 / task$0.001 / task lower (gemini-3.7-flash leads)

gemini-3.1-pro: 0.7% of Google AI Pro (4.2% / 5h, 0.7% / 1w) per good solve. gemini-3.7-flash: 0.7% of Google AI Pro (4.0% / 5h, 0.7% / 1w) per good solve. Each figure is a share of that agent's own plan, so there is no delta to draw.

Grades and deltas are comparable only within a suite version. See methodology.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better for coding, gemini-3.1-pro or gemini-3.7-flash?

gemini-3.7-flash clears higher: tier 4 of 5 versus tier 3 for gemini-3.1-pro on real-world@v3, our private suite of real-world coding problems. Latest measurement 2026-08-10.